Very encouraging Zn-Cu till anomaly...I believe this is an excellent VMS target based on geochem and coincident mag anomaly"
The anomaly is shown with the red star on the Google Earth image here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/chris-adamson-r-84649b4b_very-encouraging-zn-cu-till-anomalyi-activity-7346303750203940865-Pbwu?
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAqSh_YBCmE5ynNs2XN8OlAph-I9qwbU_YY
These are exerpts from 1999 report by Robert Bourdon (prospector who found the geochem anomaly) https://lnkd.in/gtHNvZXg
Notice how he's right, the mag low anomaly DOES coincide with where he found the geochemical soil (till) anomaly! This property needs to be drilled MORE (in 1988 it was drilled for 4 grams over 3.1 metres!)
email chris@miningpropertymaps.com for more information
sebo liked this thread
A few suggestions / comments ... We will in the future have a classified section and dont want to see too much self promotion/claims for sale in the forum but for now as long as it's not abused we are going to let this continue to now.
( see code of conduct- Code of Conduct | Prospectors Web )
For your privacy and to reduce spam, consider sharing contact information via direct message instead of a public post.
Reminder:
When sharing information about mineral properties in BC, please include the following:
“This property is a mineral claim for mining and exploration purposes only, as defined under the Mineral Tenure Act of British Columbia. Surface rights are not included.”
Noted, thanks Seb. I thought it was for advertising projects (mine and my clients). I just want to get more eyes on quality projects. Not about promoting myself (all about the projects). Will wait for classifieds section! Happy prospecting, all
sebo liked this reply
No stress at all !!!!
I just wanted to communicate to be clear ( and for others to see)
We are fine with a bit of traffic like this right now until we do launch our classifieds section !!
Really appreciate the participation on the page, just communicated what my teck/partner suggested .. ...
I would say though, plz definitely add the “This property is a mineral claim for mining and exploration purposes only, as defined under the Mineral Tenure Act of British Columbia. Surface rights are not included. as I do believe its what the ministry wants to see and we want to keep things running smoothly :)
Look forward to more posts .. love what your doing !!!
chris liked this reply
Sign in to participate in this thread!
Join a thriving community, access industry insights, and manage your mining claims—all in one place.